In a move that has left media executives scrambling and advertisers running for cover, Ohio Senator J.D. Vance’s call for a boycott of CBS has officially resulted in the loss of six major sponsors. What began as a post-debate grumble about biased moderators has snowballed into a full-scale corporate retreat, leaving CBS with gaping holes in its advertising lineup and an uncertain future.

It all started when Vance, feeling targeted by CBS moderators during the recent vice-presidential debate, urged his supporters to boycott the network. Accusing CBS of acting more like “Harris campaign strategists” than impartial journalists, Vance wasted no time mobilizing his base. The call for action went viral almost instantly, with the hashtag #BoycottCBS trending for days across social media platforms. The result? Six of CBS’s top advertisers — including Ford, Geico, and Amazon — have pulled the plug, leaving the network reeling.

The vice-presidential debate between J.D. Vance and Democratic nominee Tim Walz was supposed to be a measured discussion of policy issues. Instead, it became a battleground between Vance and the moderators, who repeatedly fact-checked his statements — a move that Vance has since labeled “overzealous and biased.”

“It was like a trap,” Vance said at a rally shortly after the debate. “Every time I opened my mouth, the moderators were there to ‘fact-check’ me. But when Walz was spewing his nonsense, they just nodded along like he was preaching the gospel. CBS is no longer a news network. It’s a propaganda machine, and we’ve had enough.”

Vance’s outrage didn’t just remain on the debate stage. It spilled over into the public sphere, where he rallied his supporters to take a stand. “Don’t just change the channel,” Vance said. “Change the whole system. Hit them where it hurts — their advertisers. They’re going down, folks!”

And go down they did. Within days, six major advertisers publicly cut ties with CBS, leaving executives at the network wondering if their prime-time programming is next on the chopping block.

The first to announce their departure from CBS was Geico, who, in a brief statement, confirmed they were pulling all advertisements indefinitely. “We strive to reach diverse audiences across the country, but after receiving substantial feedback from our customers, we have decided to suspend our advertising on CBS.”

That announcement was quickly followed by Ford, which made its decision known through a snappy social media post: “Built tough doesn’t mean built to tolerate bias. We’re out.”

Amazon, sensing the winds of political division, didn’t take long to join the exodus. In a more corporate tone, they stated: “As a company that values all voices, we have made the difficult decision to discontinue our advertising on CBS until further notice.”

Pepsi, Liberty Mutual, and Subway also pulled their ads, citing similar concerns about public backlash. For CBS, it was a one-two punch that left the network staggering.

“We didn’t expect this level of fallout,” admitted one CBS insider, speaking anonymously. “It started as a debate, but now it’s a full-scale advertiser revolt. This is a worst-case scenario for any network. Advertisers are our lifeblood.”

Buoyed by the success of his boycott call, J.D. Vance has not held back in celebrating what he considers a victory for free speech — and a crushing blow for media bias. At a packed rally in Ohio, Vance gleefully took credit for what he called the “advertiser rebellion.”

“Look at what happens when we stand up to the media elites!” Vance shouted to a cheering crowd. “We’ve sent CBS a message: if you don’t respect the people, the people will take their money elsewhere. The American people have had enough of these biased networks. This is the beginning of the end for them.”

Vance’s supporters, many of whom had long believed that mainstream media was working against conservative values, have hailed the boycott as a turning point in the culture wars. “We finally have proof that we can make a difference,” said one supporter at a Vance rally. “They can’t ignore us anymore. They need us more than we need them.”

The momentum of the boycott has even sparked conversations about expanding the movement to other networks. “Why stop at CBS?” asked a conservative commentator on X. “Let’s take this fight to every network that doesn’t play fair.”

As the boycott rages on, CBS is scrambling to manage the fallout. In a statement released shortly after the advertiser exodus, CBS defended its debate moderators and pushed back against claims of bias.

“We stand by the integrity of our debate moderators and their commitment to fair journalism,” the network’s statement read. “CBS has always provided a platform for balanced, thoughtful political discussion. We regret that some viewers feel differently, but we will not back down from our journalistic standards.”

Despite their firm stance, it’s clear that CBS is feeling the heat. Behind the scenes, the network is reportedly working to patch things up with advertisers and mitigate the damage. There are whispers that CBS executives are considering scaling back their future political coverage, at least until the election is over, to avoid further backlash.

“We can’t afford to lose more advertisers,” the anonymous CBS insider admitted. “The bottom line is at stake here.”

While political boycotts are often dismissed as fleeting PR stunts, the Vance-led boycott of CBS is proving to have real financial consequences. With six major advertisers already pulling out, the network is likely facing millions in lost revenue — and the potential for more advertisers to follow.

Experts say the financial hit could have long-term implications for the network. “When advertisers pull out, it’s not just about the immediate loss of revenue,” said media analyst Karen Winters. “It’s also about the long-term reputation damage. Other brands might now view CBS as too politically risky to advertise with, and that could hurt their bottom line for years to come.”

As for J.D. Vance, his boycott victory has undoubtedly given his campaign a boost. With the spotlight now firmly on him, Vance is likely to continue using his fight against CBS as a rallying cry for his supporters — and a warning to any other networks that might cross him.

As CBS grapples with the fallout from the boycott, the question on everyone’s mind is whether the network can recover. While CBS has weathered storms in the past, losing six major advertisers in a single week is no small feat.

If the boycott continues to gain momentum, CBS may be forced to rethink its entire approach to political coverage. Whether or not they can salvage their relationships with advertisers remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: J.D. Vance has thrown a wrench into their well-oiled machine, and it’s going to take more than a PR statement to fix it.

For now, CBS is in damage control mode. But as more advertisers consider jumping ship, the network may find that Vance’s rallying cry of “They’re going down!” is more than just bluster.