In a jaw-dropping revelation that has sent shockwaves through the boxing community, renowned promoter Eddie Hearn has lifted the lid on what he claims is the untold truth behind Floyd Mayweather’s legendary undefeated career. Hearn’s explosive comments have sparked heated debates among fans, fighters, and analysts alike, calling into question the legacy of one of the sport’s most iconic figures.

Floyd Mayweather, often referred to as “Money,” is widely regarded as one of the greatest boxers of all time. His 50-0 professional record has been celebrated as a testament to his unparalleled skill, defensive genius, and ring IQ. Over two decades, Mayweather dismantled a host of elite fighters, from Oscar De La Hoya and Manny Pacquiao to Canelo Alvarez. His ability to outthink and outmaneuver his opponents, coupled with his unmatched defensive techniques, allowed him to maintain an unblemished record throughout his career.

Mayweather’s nickname “TBE” (The Best Ever) has become synonymous with his flawless record, and his undefeated streak is a cornerstone of his legacy.

However, Eddie Hearn’s recent statements have added a layer of controversy to this legacy. During a recent interview, Hearn hinted that Mayweather’s career might not be as “flawless” as it seems. According to Hearn, there were factors behind the scenes that played a crucial role in keeping Mayweather’s record intact, some of which he believes have never been discussed publicly.

Hearn, who has been at the forefront of modern boxing promotions, suggested that selective matchmaking and strategic timing were significant contributors to Mayweather’s unblemished record. “People need to understand that every decision in boxing is calculated,” Hearn remarked. “Mayweather’s team were experts at picking the right opponents at the right time, often when those opponents were either past their prime or not fully prepared.”

Hearn’s comments touch on a long-standing debate within the boxing world: did Mayweather truly face the best opponents at their peak, or was his career carefully orchestrated to maintain his unbeaten record? Critics have pointed to fights such as his bout with Manny Pacquiao, which took place years after both fighters were past their primes, as evidence of this strategic approach.

Additionally, Hearn alluded to behind-the-scenes negotiations and concessions that may have favored Mayweather, from weight stipulations to fight locations. “Every detail was meticulously planned,” Hearn continued. “It’s not to take away from Floyd’s skills—he’s a genius in the ring—but the business side of boxing played a massive role in his success.”

The response to Hearn’s revelations has been swift and divided. Die-hard Mayweather fans have dismissed the claims as baseless attempts to undermine a legacy built on hard work and talent. On social media, debates have raged over whether Mayweather’s undefeated record should now be viewed with skepticism.

On the other hand, some fans and industry insiders believe Hearn’s comments validate suspicions they’ve held for years. The idea that boxing, like any other business, is driven by strategy and careful planning rather than pure competition, is not new, but Hearn’s insights have reignited the conversation.

As of now, Floyd Mayweather has remained silent in response to Hearn’s statements. Known for his confidence and brash persona, it will be interesting to see if “Money” addresses these allegations or dismisses them entirely. Mayweather’s supporters argue that regardless of how his fights were arranged, his skill set and dominance inside the ring speak for themselves.

Eddie Hearn’s revelation has undoubtedly rocked the boxing world and sparked a fresh wave of debate about what it truly means to be “undefeated.” Whether one views Mayweather’s career as a flawless display of boxing mastery or as a carefully curated journey to 50-0, there’s no denying that the discussion has added a layer of intrigue to his already storied legacy. For now, fans will be left to wonder: was Mayweather’s path to greatness purely talent-driven, or was it the result of behind-the-scenes maneuvering?